| |
 |
|
The Corporate Retreat |
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
The Corporate Retreat: 4
Success Factors
by Janet Britcher
The
success factors to a corporate
retreat are: a clear purpose,
quality dialogue, individual
impact, and concrete follow-up.
1. Purpose: Compelling Change
A clear
purpose becomes the call
to action for participants.
Leaders hold a retreat when
there is a compelling business
reason to create a new result
with all the brains in the
room – whether that’s the
executive team, a newly
formed department, or the
entire company.
A retreat
is the right forum for a
significant business challenge
that will affect the company’s
success, a challenge that
will benefit from being
addressed by the combined
intelligence of the team
members. If stellar results
are being created with current
operating procedures, products
and sales plans, generally
there’s no need for a retreat.
A compelling
change to be addressed at
a retreat can also be a
process change, relationship
building, integrating a
new group member, or increased
motivation by reenergizing
commitment.
2. Dialogue
To
set the stage for constructive
dialogue, a successful retreat
generally begins with several
presenters from the team
who provide the business
context (relevant data,
pressure points, market
intelligence, or specific
opportunities). Distinguish
between data, ideas, recommendations
and possibilities. Be specific
about areas that are up
for discussion, and those
that are non-negotiable.
There may be grumblings
about areas that are fixed,
but much less than if those
real constraints are not
identified until later.
A leader
already has two roles at
a retreat: the leader role,
and the one-of-us role.
It is important to be able
to play both roles. Wise
leaders realize they cannot
also effectively play a
third role of facilitator.
The
role of facilitator begins
in advance, behind the scenes
to help plan agenda, and
continues at the retreat,
to pace information to increase
the chances of a good flow
of ideas. Facilitators plan
small group and large group
activities that are appropriate
to the task at hand, observe
who is holding back and
who is stuck in a group
role such as devil’s advocate
or peace keeper. Facilitators
exercise judgment about
following a constructive
tangent, maintaining flexibility
while managing time.
For
best result, allow plenty
of opportunity for divergent
views. If participants expect
there will be real interest
in meaningful discussion
on the part of the leader,
deep engagement occurs.
If participants have the
experience that the tacit
rules are to nod in agreement,
that will also be delivered.
Once
a proposed idea has support,
it should be followed by
analysis and debate to ensure
there is traction, and to
anticipate any obvious obstacles.
These challenges also help
clarify leadership’s position,
for example on risk taking,
technology supremacy, long
range vs. short range goals,
and other business tradeoffs.
Any decisions that can be
made on the spot should
be.
3. Individual Impact
Generally
an offsite begins with a
big business question, such
as market, operations, strategy,
product development, morale,
growth, geographic expansion
or acquisition. It should
end with an individual action
plan.
“It’s essential to tie it
back to the individual’s
job,” says Marcia Nizzari,
Director of Informatics
Development at the Broad
Institute of MIT and Harvard,
Cambridge. How will the
recommended action impact
the day-to-day work back
at the office?
This
does two things. First,
it tests the decision or
new initiative. It may sound
great in the abstract but
through scenario planning
at the individual or department
level, additional obstacles
may be anticipated and resolved.
Second, creating individual
action steps also enhances
personal commitment. This
isn’t just self-interest
at work, it’s a hallmark
of accountability.
4. Follow-up
Before
the end of the offsite,
schedule next steps. List
who will do what by when.
This should include whatever
individual tasks have been
created. A self-addressed
envelope that includes a
“memo to self” to accomplish
something can be written,
sealed, and mailed in 3
weeks.
Follow-up
plans should also include
dedicated management meetings
where the same group reconvenes,
6 – 8 weeks following the
retreat, and another 6 –
8 weeks after that. This
is the time to verify or
modify plans, raise and
resolve obstacles. Tactical
implementation is the ultimate
test of a good plan.
Janet Britcher is President
of Transformation Management,
a Boston consulting company
offering retreat facilitation,
executive coaching and management
development.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|